Work

Work:The Last 1,000 Years

  • Paperback

    + free ebook

    Sale price $19.95
    Page redirects on selection
    Add to cart
  • Hardback

    + free ebook

    Sale price $26.95
    Page redirects on selection
    Add to cart
  • Ebook

    Sale price $9.99
    Page redirects on selection
    Add to cart

Tracing the complexity and contradictory nature of work throughout history

Andrea Komlosy argues in this important intervention that, when we examine it closely, work changes its meanings according to different historical and regional contexts. Globalizing labour history from the thirteenth to the twenty-first centuries, she sheds light on the complex coexistence of multiple forms of labour (paid/unpaid, free/ unfree, with various forms of legal regulation and social protection and so on) on the local and the world levels. Combining this global approach with a gender perspective opens our eyes to the varieties of work and labour and their combination in households and commodity chains across the planet—processes that enable capital accumulation not only by extracting surplus value from wage-labour, but also through other forms of value transfer, realized by tapping into households’ subsistence production, informal occupation and makeshift employment. As the debate about work and its supposed disappearance intensifies, Komlosy’s book provides a crucial shift in the angle of vision.

Reviews

  • Capturing this churn [in both work itself and our ideas about it] is the difficult task that historian Andrea Komlosy attempts in her new book Work: The Last 1,000 Years….Komlosy attempts the monumental task of writing a large-scale global history of labor adequate to the growing instability in how we define and participate in work.

    Gabriel WinantThe Nation
  • A fascinating book

    Laurie Taylor, Thinking Allowed, BBC RADIO 4
  • As Andrea Komlosy argues in Work: The Last 1,000 Years, our conception of what constitutes work has changed markedly over time. The professor of social history at the University of Vienna writes that our commonly accepted definitions are too narrow, too European, too male and too modern

    John ThornhillFinancial Times